<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Writer&#039;s thingamablog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog</link>
	<description>Thoughts of The Writer folk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:34:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waxing lyrical #1 by Paul Machin</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=1256#comment-16032</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Machin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=1256#comment-16032</guid>
		<description>&quot;If hooks could kill
singing dollar dollar bill
on the street of my life&quot;
The Boom Boom Bap, Scritti Politti – these lyrics went *boom* in my head when I heard them sung at SP&#039;s gig last week</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If hooks could kill<br />
singing dollar dollar bill<br />
on the street of my life&#8221;<br />
The Boom Boom Bap, Scritti Politti – these lyrics went *boom* in my head when I heard them sung at SP&#8217;s gig last week</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That was myself, Lord Sugar by George Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=1223#comment-15548</link>
		<dc:creator>George Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=1223#comment-15548</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a theory about this ‘myself’ fluff.

I think it&#039;s about buying time when you don&#039;t know what you&#039;re saying, or you have no clue what you&#039;re going to say next (as so much waffly business speak is).

The longer the words you say, the more time you have to think of your next point, so it becomes the most practical way to buy yourself time and still (tenuously, hideously) make your point. That’s why people say &#039;we will implement the utilisation of this strategy&#039; rather than &#039;we&#039;ll do it like this&#039;, for example. It&#039;s just because they don&#039;t know what on Earth they&#039;re going to say next.

Fact is though, you sound like a wally when you do it. And in writing you really can&#039;t hide away from making your point with all this filler. You&#039;re not locked in a room with these people, so they can&#039;t scythe through the nonsense with a cutting question. You have to lay your cards bare simply and clearly (and ideally with a splash of personality).

That&#039;s how you sound credible. Not this &#039;It was myself, Lord Sugar&#039; silliness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a theory about this ‘myself’ fluff.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s about buying time when you don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re saying, or you have no clue what you&#8217;re going to say next (as so much waffly business speak is).</p>
<p>The longer the words you say, the more time you have to think of your next point, so it becomes the most practical way to buy yourself time and still (tenuously, hideously) make your point. That’s why people say &#8216;we will implement the utilisation of this strategy&#8217; rather than &#8216;we&#8217;ll do it like this&#8217;, for example. It&#8217;s just because they don&#8217;t know what on Earth they&#8217;re going to say next.</p>
<p>Fact is though, you sound like a wally when you do it. And in writing you really can&#8217;t hide away from making your point with all this filler. You&#8217;re not locked in a room with these people, so they can&#8217;t scythe through the nonsense with a cutting question. You have to lay your cards bare simply and clearly (and ideally with a splash of personality).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how you sound credible. Not this &#8216;It was myself, Lord Sugar&#8217; silliness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What a difference a year makes by Blogatron 3000</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=1027#comment-11127</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogatron 3000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=1027#comment-11127</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim – thanks for the comment.

When I started rummaging in Ericsson’s vaults, I was actually looking for what I now know is that summary report. But I found those two main reports first, and their breathtakingly contrasting openings demanded a blog. You’re right, we do use that summary report cover in workshops. It helps us show people you can be serious without being formal. And that writing – any writing – is one-to-one communication.

Jan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim – thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>When I started rummaging in Ericsson’s vaults, I was actually looking for what I now know is that summary report. But I found those two main reports first, and their breathtakingly contrasting openings demanded a blog. You’re right, we do use that summary report cover in workshops. It helps us show people you can be serious without being formal. And that writing – any writing – is one-to-one communication.</p>
<p>Jan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What a difference a year makes by Tim Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=1027#comment-11065</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=1027#comment-11065</guid>
		<description>Hello Jan. Interesting observations. I was writing for Ericsson in 2002 and 2003, and wrote Carl-Henric’s letter (I also write for him at BP). You are right that the formal  annual report in 2002 starts with that dull boiler plate stuff, while 2003 started with the CEO letter. But you might want to note that in 2002 great use was made of the Summary Review, which was a much warmer piece (and features a front cover sometimes cited in workshops at The Writer). You can see it here: http://www.ericsson.com/res/investors/docs/annual-reports-1970-2002/business_review_2002_eng.pdf
Your overall point is right, however: regardless of the degree of formality involved, a report is about people communicating with people. Even when the annual report is carrying a heavy legal and regulatory burden, there are always opportunities to introduce a level of conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jan. Interesting observations. I was writing for Ericsson in 2002 and 2003, and wrote Carl-Henric’s letter (I also write for him at BP). You are right that the formal  annual report in 2002 starts with that dull boiler plate stuff, while 2003 started with the CEO letter. But you might want to note that in 2002 great use was made of the Summary Review, which was a much warmer piece (and features a front cover sometimes cited in workshops at The Writer). You can see it here: <a href="http://www.ericsson.com/res/investors/docs/annual-reports-1970-2002/business_review_2002_eng.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ericsson.com/res/investors/docs/annual-reports-1970-2002/business_review_2002_eng.pdf</a><br />
Your overall point is right, however: regardless of the degree of formality involved, a report is about people communicating with people. Even when the annual report is carrying a heavy legal and regulatory burden, there are always opportunities to introduce a level of conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You’re not kidding anyone by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=823#comment-7804</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=823#comment-7804</guid>
		<description>&#039;..rudie pictures&#039;.. yeah. These ads with their evasive dishonesty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;..rudie pictures&#8217;.. yeah. These ads with their evasive dishonesty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wenlock and Mandeville: what great – if strangely gloomy – names&#8230; by Henry Rawlinson</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=806#comment-7028</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Rawlinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=806#comment-7028</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ll find it was William Penny Brookes. Now, could you have a lady called Wenlock Mandyville?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll find it was William Penny Brookes. Now, could you have a lady called Wenlock Mandyville?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gym&#8217;ll fix it by Anelia</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=772#comment-6479</link>
		<dc:creator>Anelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=772#comment-6479</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s much more than straightforward. 

It&#039;s *funny*.

Made me laugh, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s much more than straightforward. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s *funny*.</p>
<p>Made me laugh, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gym&#8217;ll fix it by Charli</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=772#comment-6463</link>
		<dc:creator>Charli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=772#comment-6463</guid>
		<description>I love the ad. Compare it to what you usually see - smiling gym bunnies and &#039;go get&#039;em&#039; headlines - this is refreshing.

There&#039;s a Fit4less in Aldgate that I go to and it&#039;s great. Not at all Ryanair like.

They don&#039;t cut corners. They just have the stuff you really need in a gym, like super-snazzy equipment, and none of the nonsense, like Jo Malone handwash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the ad. Compare it to what you usually see &#8211; smiling gym bunnies and &#8216;go get&#8217;em&#8217; headlines &#8211; this is refreshing.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a Fit4less in Aldgate that I go to and it&#8217;s great. Not at all Ryanair like.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t cut corners. They just have the stuff you really need in a gym, like super-snazzy equipment, and none of the nonsense, like Jo Malone handwash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jungle fusion pioneers by Vicki Winslow</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=763#comment-6335</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Winslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=763#comment-6335</guid>
		<description>For 35 years, I have loved my Raleigh &quot;Sport,&quot; which sadly is not in the same league as a &quot;Stealth&quot; or a &quot;Paradox.&quot; But it is British racing green, with a snappy black leatherette bag behind the seat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 35 years, I have loved my Raleigh &#8220;Sport,&#8221; which sadly is not in the same league as a &#8220;Stealth&#8221; or a &#8220;Paradox.&#8221; But it is British racing green, with a snappy black leatherette bag behind the seat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Methinks he doth protest too much by Vicki Winslow</title>
		<link>http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=765#comment-6334</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Winslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewriter.co.uk/thingamablog/?p=765#comment-6334</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t heard that texting can improve literacy, but that is excellent news--and it proves once again that each generation always grumbles about the shortcomings of youth, usually for no good reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard that texting can improve literacy, but that is excellent news&#8211;and it proves once again that each generation always grumbles about the shortcomings of youth, usually for no good reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

